WebMassachusetts Burma law's "generality stands at odds with the federal discreteness" and therefore must give way, even though, as Massachusetts claimed, both statutes "share the same goals" 20 and "some companies may be able to comply with both sets of sanctions. "21 Finally, the Court concluded that the Massachusetts sanctions prevented the ... WebHastings International and Comparative Law Review Volume 21 Number 4Summer 1998 Article 13 1-1-1998 The World Trade Organization and States' Rights: Will Foreign …
Massachusetts, Burma and the World Trade Organization: A …
WebMassachusetts Burma Procurement Law Challenged at WTO The serious human rights violations and the deliberate suppression of democracy perpetrated by the military junta … WebThe Massachusetts Burma Law Description: Articles on the Massachusetts Burma Law and selective purchasing laws Source/publisher: "Burma Debate", Vol. VI, No. 2 Date of … theler center
Massachusetts
WebThe first is a claim that action that Congress took as to Burma in 1996, three months after the enactment of our law, preempts Massachusetts and other states and cities from enacting this type of selective purchasing law. WebCall for Amicus Support of Massachusetts: The State of Massachusetts has asked the Supreme Court to review the decision by a federal court of appeals that overturned the Mass. "Burma law." The law is modeled after the successful anti-Apartheid boycott laws that were adopted by 25 states and 80 local governments. The Massachusetts Burma Law was a law enacted in 1996 by the Massachusetts General Court limiting state entities from purchasing services from companies doing business with Myanmar (Burma). This law was enacted three months before the introduction of federal sanctions on trade with Burma. A … Ver más • Federalism • Supremacy Clause • 179th Massachusetts General Court (1995–1996) Ver más • Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council Ver más theler christoph zürich