Popatlal shah v state of madras
WebPoppatlal Shah v. State Of Madras. Mukherjea, J.—. This appeal, which has come before us on a certificate granted by the Madras High Court under Articles 134 (1) (c) and 132 (1) of … WebApr 9, 2024 · Judgement of A.K. Gopalan vs the State of Madras. The judgment of this case was given by 6 judges constitutional bench of the Supreme Court with the ratio of 5:1 majority. Justice Fazl Ali gave the dissenting opinion. The court rejected the arguments given by A.K. Gopalan and said that personal liberty means freedom of the physical body …
Popatlal shah v state of madras
Did you know?
WebCase Summary - Romesh Thapar v State of Madras (1950) Freedom of the press is an essential component of a thriving democracy and this right is not limited to newspapers but to other vehicles of information flow also. In this day and age, it can be argued that such a WebPopatlal Amichand Shah vs State Of Maharashtra And Another on 12 October, 1983. Equivalent citations: (1984) 86 BOMLR 174. Author: Gadgil. ... Similar were the facts in …
WebPoppatlal Shah v/s State of Madras CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 92 of 1952 Decided On, 30 March 1953. At, ... This appeal, which has come before us … WebPoppatlal Shah Vs. The State of Madras [1953] INSC 27 (30 March 1953), 1953 Latest Caselaw 27 SC
WebAug 4, 2024 · In case of doubt it is always safe to look into the object and purpose of the statute or the reason and spirit behind it. Each word, phrase or sentence has to be construed in the light of the general purpose of the Act itself, as observed by Mukherjea J., in Popatlal Shah v. State of Madras 12 and a WebPOPPATLAL SHAH Vs. STATE OF MADRAS. LAWS(MAD)-1952-8-7 HIGH COURT OF MADRAS. Decided on August 29,1952 POPPATLAL SHAH Appellant. VERSUS STATE OF …
WebUnited Motors (India) Ltd.’, AIR 1953 SC 252 (E) and — ‘Popatlal Shah v. State of Madras’, AIR 1953 SC 274 (F) and further that, the observations regarding the second Explanation to S. 2(g) contradict what the Bench stated earlier on the subject. With all due respect to the learned Judges, we do not agree.
WebThe State of Madras [1953] INSC 27 (30 March 1953) Poppatlal Shah Vs. The State of Madras [1953] INSC 27 (30 March 1953) 1953 Latest Caselaw 27 SC. Under the Madras … cthltxrjWebJun 1, 2024 · The judgement of A.K. Gopalan v State of Madras was delivered by the then Chief Justice of India Hiralal Kania, CJ. In the above case, the court ruled by a three-fourths majority that the term “law” used in article 21 of the Indian Constitution only means due process, and due to the preventive nature of Gopalan’s arrest under the law Detention law … earthing pit calculationWebSep 28, 2024 · The State of Madras and Ors. By. Anika Kumar. -. September 28, 2024. In the Supreme Court of India 1960 AIR 1080 Petitioner Kavalappara Kottarathil Kochuni Respondents The State of Madras & ors. Date of Judgement 04.05.1960 Bench Justice B.P. Sinha; C.J., A.K. Sarkar; Justice J.C. Shah; Justice K. Subba Rao; Justice Syed Jaffer Imam. earthing pit nameplateWebI will be analysing the case of Poppatlal Shah v State of Madras 1953 which is a post-independence case of 1953. Facts. This is an appeal against the order passed by the … cth letterheadhttp://student.manupatra.com/academic/abk/constitutional-law-of-india/Table-of-Cases.htm earthing pit drawingWebAppeal by special leave from the judgment and -order dated March 22, 1963, of the Madras High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 114 of 1961. A. V. Viswanatha Sastry, K. Jayaram and … cthltxrfWeb77. Poppatlal Shah v State of Madras, AIR 1953 SC 274, p 276 : 1953 SCR 677. See further Aswini Kumar Ghose v Arabinda Bose, AIR 1952 SC 369, p 382 : 1953 SCR 1. "But the value of such previous interpretation as a guide to construction will vary with the circumstances." Even if the phrase earlier interpreted remains unchanged but if the system in which it is … earthing pit design